Sakasa Kebari... Not the No.1 Tenkara Fly?

8 CommentsThursday, 11 August 2016  |  JP

Masami SakakibaraNo one can argue that the long soft hackled sakasa kebari style has become the icon of tenkara flies in the west. These flies are so different from what we recognise as a conventional western fly that it’s no wonder they captured the imagination of fledgling tenkara anglers exploring this new and exotic fishing experience.

Before we go any further I’d just like to get one thing straight... what follows here is in no way an attempt to spoil anyone’s fun or to tell you how you should be fishing or tying your tenkara flies. The purpose of this post is to share some interesting facts about the flies of tenkara and hopefully get people exploring the rich tapestry of patterns that can be found in Japan.

Like many people new to tenkara both myself (and Paul) spent our early days exploring reverse hackle patterns both in traditional Japanese patterns such as the Takayama style (or the less well known Okumikawa style) and initially with a few adapted western patterns too. In those early days of tenkara’s spread outside Japan source information in English was difficult to find and Yoshikazu Fujioka’s website My Best Streams was (and still is) a great source of information for anyone interested in traditional regional tenkara patterns.

In 2014 we decided to visit the mountain streams of Japan to begin our own research into the attitudes of tenkara anglers to their flies for our Vol.2 DVD. What we discovered has drawn us back to Japan every year since and has become the subject matter for 2 DVDs and our 418 page Discovering Kebari eBook (UK /EU link hereUSA link here). 


In all of our research and in interviewing some of the best tenkara practitioners in Japan we started to realize that the iconic fly of tenkara, the “sakasa kebari”, was not the no.1 fly choice of for a great number of tenkara anglers. This is not to say that the sakasa style has no place... quite the opposite in fact; almost everyone we interviewed had some sakasa kebari patterns in their fly box but they are normally reserved for specific scenarios as opposed to being the go-to pattern for all round fishing duties.

So, what is the No.1 fly choice when it comes to Japanese kebari?

The most frequent kebari style we’ve observed in our studies use stiff rooster hackles which look very much like western dry fly hackles (BUT are actually wet flies!). The examples below are just a few of the go-to patterns shared with us by anglers in Japan. 



The hackle style is often referred to as “jun” which translates to normal or regular (in direct contrast to “sakasa” meaning reversed). Jun can also be used to describe soft hackles in the normal orientation i.e. swept back like a North Country wet fly. It doesn’t seem to matter which side of a stiff feather faces forward as long as the hackle is more or less straight up and down it would be called a jun/normal hackle.

These stiff hackle kebari are not unheard of in the west but they are often not recognised or fully appreciated for what they are... we’ve seen several instances where well known and respected western angling writers have mistakenly referred to jun kebari styles as “tenkara dry flies”. While they could be fished dry their main function is as a wet fly pattern.

So, what’s so good about these kebari?

A stiff hackled kebari/wet fly can offer significant physical or mechanical advantages over soft hackled sakasa patterns; a few of which include,

-  maintaining profile in strong flows

-  improved aerodynamics for more accurate casting

-  the ability to “anchor” the fly in opposing current

-  increased vibration/disturbance when manipulated

If you’ve never experimented with stiff hackled wets I would strongly urge you to give them a try. It’s no coincidence that they are the No.1 choice for so many Japanese tenkara anglers... they reward anglers ability; for example, allowing skilled casters to achieve pinpoint presentation or light line users to keep their fly in the same spot for longer. 

A typical Japanese anglerís fly box featuring a majority of stiff hackles



      
A typical Japanese angler’s fly box featuring a majority of stiff hackles 
 

Want a second opinion?

It’s hard to argue with the facts... in addition to the extensive research Paul and I have carried out in Japan, Yoshikazu Fujioka has done extensive studies on Japanese kebari styles.

How extensive? Well, believe it or not Fujioka san actually recorded and then plotted the frequency of various hackle styles. The numbers he found reflect that normal stiff hackled kebari are the most popular in Japan by a long way....

Would you like to see? Well, (believe it or not) Fujioka san is kind enough to publish his graphs on PAGE 2 of the document on this link on his great and extensive (English Language!) site:

CLICK HERE TO SEE PDF (don't forget to scroll to page 2 to see the "radar plots")

 

Some figures from Fujioka san’s results,
Frequency of long/soft/reverse hackle (the “classic” sakasa style) – 11.7%
Frequency of short/stiff/normal hackle – 38.5%

Because flies with stiff hackles are amazing for some of the most effective "anchoring" and "water-disturbing" presentations - you're missing a HUGE chunk of tenkara opportunities if they aren't in your armoury. So, if you’d like to lock in some tried and tested stiff hackled patterns; Click the link below and have a really close look at out our new range of kebari sets here. 

CLICK HERE TO SEE THE PREMIUM STIFF-HACKLE KEBARI SELECTION

 

JP

 

 


Bob.
Thursday, 11 August 2016  |  20:41

Nicely written post here. I'm not surprised however, being as the soft hackle fly is meant to emulate an emerger, which is usually a lesser event in stream life cycle. Thank you for the great inspiration. Bob.


Jason Klass
Monday, 15 August 2016  |  5:31

Doesn't the stiff hackle move less in the water and slow the fly from sinking?


JP
Monday, 15 August 2016  |  15:41

Thatís a really great question Jason, thanks for taking the time to read and comment.

There are so many variables itís almost impossible to say whether one would sink faster than the other.

If you think about it, for any given hook size, stiff hackles often tend to be of a smaller size when compared to soft hackles so thereís the hydrodynamic advantage of a lower profile there; stiff hackle tends to have virtually no barbules on the fibres whereas soft hackles tend to have a lot more barbules along each hackle fibre, which again gives a hydrodynamic advantage to the stiff hackle.

On the other hand stiff hackles can be denser in their fibre count so for any given number of turns youíre likely to have a fly with more fibres of hackle for the same number of wraps with stiff hackle.

Iím sure with some careful tying it would be possible to make a soft hackle kebari that could sink faster than a stiff hackle or vice versa.

Iíve seen quite a few tyings from Japanese tenkara anglers where theyíve used dry fly dubbings or polypropylene yarn for the body which would suggest that (at least in these examples) sink rate is not a big consideration. Also their use of fine wire hooks may support this theory.

Iíve also seen Dr Ishigaki chew the hackles off flies when fishing with him in Japan Ė this would obviously make them sink quicker (but this was not his primary reason for doing it).

When you add in the possibility of using down-welling currents on stream, the sink rate between the two styles of fly seems less important than the individual anglerís skill in achieving depth through other means. That being said, in strong currents you may actually lose some ability to ďsailĒ your fly in that current with soft hackles as they tend to become more streamlined in very strong flows.


David
Friday, 19 August 2016  |  22:58

Long before I heard you guys throw out the name Jun Kebari (順毛鉤) I had read about the Futsū kebari (普通毛鉤).

Jun kebari most frequently translates as Order fly, but sometimes as Forward fly. Leading me to think a Jun Kebari has the hackle pointing toward the hook bend. Forward not reversed, or upside down, aka opposite of Sakasa Kebari.

Futsū kebari always translates as - ordinary , common, usual fly. Leaving me to think a Futsū kebari has a neutral hackle. Neither forward or reverse facing. I think I see a lot of flies people call a sakasa kebari but they are really Futsū kebari. This thinking, that it means a neutral hackle orientation, was reinforced by a Fuji Hiromichi post called 冨士流「普通毛ばり」を巻く, Fuji Style "futsū kebari" winding. The bottom one.

http://orange.zero.jp/tenkarakai.wing/kouza/kouza3.htm

Typing in - futsuu kebari or futuu kebari will give you the same kanji 普通毛鉤.

All that to ask this. What is the difference between a Jun Kebari and a Futsū kebari ? Or is there a difference?

Though they seem to be two different types of kebari. Often the names appear to be used interchangeably. Or not strictly adhered to. But there must be a better definition than just - not a sakasa kebari. Anyway for a couple of years now and again I've written that I think the sakasa kebari needs to share the icon spotlight on the world of tenkara stage with the Futsū kebari & 順毛鉤. Usually with the response that seems to say I've gone off my meds and I need some quiet time in the corner. Good article.


JP
Sunday, 21 August 2016  |  14:43

Thanks for taking the time to write David.

We've asked a lot of Japanese anglers about their ways of naming kebari and time after time we've been met with a puzzled look and an answer along the lines of "it's just a kebari".

There doesn't seem to be any standardized scheme for the naming of kebari among Japanese anglers and the only time we've heard jun and futsū used it was a way of distinguishing the hackle style as "normal" or "regular" as opposed to sakasa.

Sorry the answer is a little mundane but from the conversations we've had with guys in Japan I get the impression (from their perspective) it's a bit like discussing the size of a Coke in McDonald's... is it regular, medium or standard?

People are genuinely missing out by focusing only on sakasa styles. Sakasa kebari definitely have their uses but those stiff hackled kebari/wet flies are just fantastic!


David
Friday, 19 August 2016  |  23:16

Opps. A typo at the end, ... tenkara stage with the Futsū kebari & Jun kebari.

Direct link to the Fuji Style Futsū / Futuu kebari. The previous direction to it was, I think, a little vague.

http://orange.zero.jp/tenkarakai.wing/kouza/futuu.htm


MG
Saturday, 20 August 2016  |  10:15

Nice article. When he visited Utah in 2015 for Oni School, Sakakibara-San essentially made the same point to the students there: Sakasa kebari have incorrectly been promoted in the West as the main form of Japanese Tenkara fly.


JP
Sunday, 21 August 2016  |  15:01

Thanks MG,

Paul and I have been lucky enough to fish with Masami on more than one occasion in Japan. Last year we spent a couple of weeks with him and visited his famous fishing hut in Toyama. He uses a lot of stiff hackles but he also uses the sakasa style flies more than some of the Japanese anglers we've seen.

I suppose the sakasa kebari has become the stereotype in the west because it's the one that stands out the most as being different and (almost) unique to tenkara - but, as with most stereotypes, it's an oversimplification that latches on to the a single recognizable facet of a much more complex whole.